AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Apollo Mist
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Green Crack @ 8 weeks

 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - The California Supreme Court on Thursday rejected limits on medical marijuana imposed by state lawmakers, finding that people with recommendations for pot can have and grow all they need for personal use.

The high court ruled lawmakers improperly "amended" the voter-approved law that decriminalized possession of marijuana for "seriously ill Californians" with a doctor's recommendation by limiting patients to eight ounces (227 grams) of dried marijuana and six mature or 12 immature plants.

The Compassionate Use Act, passed by California voters in 1996, set no limits on how much marijuana patients could possess or grow, stating only that it be for personal use.

In 1997, the state's Supreme Court defined a lawful amount as enough to be "reasonably related to the patient's current medical needs."

The state's quantity limits were passed in 2003 as part of a voluntary identification card program designed to protect against both drug trafficking and wrongful arrest by allowing police to quickly verify a patient's recommendation.

The court on Thursday let stand the voluntary card program but found that the limits it imposes should not "burden" a person's ability to argue under the Compassionate Use Act that the marijuana possessed or grown was for personal use.

California Attorney General Jerry Brown said in a statement the decision "confirms our position that the state's possession limits are legal" as applied to medical marijuana cardholders.

A lawyer for plaintiff Patrick Kevin Kelly could not be reached immediately for comment.

Kelly, who obtained a recommendation for medical marijuana to alleviate a range of medical issues including hepatitis C, back problems and depression, did not register in the card program.

He was arrested in 2005 for growing marijuana plants and possessing 12 ounces of dried marijuana and was found guilty of marijuana cultivation and possession.

The case is People v. Kelly, Case No. S164830, California Supreme Court.

 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
dank nugs of the day
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Last Updated (Friday, 15 January 2010 10:20)

 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Dick Gammick coming forward with the same washed out antiquated arguments.
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
An even prettier flower
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 
Legalize
Should marijuana be legalized?
 
dankweed.com
Dankweed.com RSS Twitter Facebook

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional